By Huang Ruiyong
http://bbs.jibi.net/dispbbs.asp?boardid=91&Id=119905
Generally
speaking, actual mintage is a number in contrast to planned mintage.
Just as the name suggests, actual mintage is the actual number of a coin
or medal actually minted. In the case of modern Chinese precious metal
coins, actual mintage is highly significant, because it reflects very
vividly the release history of modern Chinese precious metal coins. As
we all know, the primary function of the early modern Chinese precious
metal coins was to bring back foreign exchange, while promoting Chinese
politics and culture worldwide. Except for coins for important political
events, many coins before Year 2000 were initiated by overseas
distributors, who came to the People's Bank of China for approval and
announcing the release. Then they would seek out Shanghai Mint, Shenyang
Mint or Shenzhen Guobao Mint for production before distributing the
coins. For example, the Historical Figures series gold and silver coins
were distributed by MDM in Germany; 8 gram lunars and dodecagonal Birds
gold and silver coins were distributed by the Hong Kong Peking Coin
Company Limited; the Guilin Scenery gold and silver coins were
distributed by Ocean Gold Coins in Hong Kong; the Ancient Inventions and
Discoveries series were distributed by PandaAmerica; the early Guanyin
series gold and silver coins were distributed by Chien Hsiung Liu Co. in
the US; the Unicorn series were distributed by Assets Marketing Co; the
Silk Road series gold and silver coins were distributed by ING in
Belgium… Fortunately, after Year 2000, distribution of Chinese precious
metal coins was consolidated. Almost all the products have been
distributed by the China Gold Coin Co., to the Kaiyuan Retail Center in
Beijing, Shenzhen Retail Center, Hong Kong Great Wall Coins Investments
Ltd., as well as MDM in Germany and PandaAmerica.
In the early
years, the distributors proposed different product specs and planned
mintage for precious metal coins because their capacity and channels
varied. Under normal circumstances, the distributor would generally
avoid producing the full planned mintage, because 1. They wanted to test
market reaction to the coin; 2. They had to put together a large amount
of money for the material and manufacturing cost. The distributor would
ask for termination or suspension of production of a certain coin if
the following occurred:
1. The market did not react favorably to the coin;
2. The distributor's business operations and cash flow were disrupted;
3. Management team change at the People's Bank of China, the China Gold Coin Co. (or China Mint Company) or the distributor.
When this happened, the concept of actual mintage, which is on every collector's mind, would come into the focus.
With
this explanation of actual mintage (original actual mintage), we all
see that actual mintage has a big impact on the assessment of the rarity
of a certain coin, because it is the essence of collection that rarity
determines the price. But we may be concerned with two more questions at
the same time:
1. How are the data of actual mintage of various precious metal coins obtained?
2. How do we treat the rumor widespread on the web of restrikes by Shanghai Mint of some types during 2001 to 2005?
Here are my answers to the two questions above:
1. The
data on actual mintage has to be verified by using materials from many
sources. This is a dynamic verification process. So far, no institutions
or individuals have been able to come up with accurate actual mintage
numbers of all the precious metal coins from the PRC. This problem
resulted from the overwhelming power of the distributors before 2000,
who could directly influence the entire process of project approval,
announcement, production and sales. Moreover, domestic supervisory and
production organizations did not maintain complete, systematic records.
In this light, in order to obtain a clear understanding of actual
mintage, the following needs to be investigated:
Historical distribution records of the these companies: China Mint Company, China Gold Coin Co., China Coins Limited;
Historical
production records of these organizations: Shanghai Mint, Shenyang
Mint, Guobao Mint, Swiss Faude & Huguenin, Swiss Pamp Mint, Swiss
Vacambi Mint, and Perth Mint of Australia;
All the sales records
of distributors and retailers, including: Hong Kong Great Wall Coins
Investments Ltd., Peking Coin Company Limited, PandaAmerica, MDM of
Germany, Japanese Taisei Coins Corporation, ING of Belgium and so on.
This
is a very arduous and complex process, which must be treated with
absolute seriousness. Through the collaboration of both official and
civilian efforts, the issue of actual mintage is expected to be worked
out for the most part.
2. Restrikes of some coins by Shanghai Mint after Year 2000 are described as follows:
According
to records in the Yearbook of Shanghai Mint (2002-2003), Yearbook of
Shanghai Mint (2004), Yearbook of Shanghai Mint (2005) and Yearbook of
Shanghai Mint (2006), all the restrikes of coins before Year 2000 are
listed below, in Table 1, 2 and 3:
(The tables are translated, merged and formated in this link: http://china-mint.info/forum/index.php?topic=18.msg15153#msg15153)
OK. Let me explain the restrikes from Tables 1 to 3.
First
of all, restrikes are not unique to China. Other countries in the world
also make restrikes, but they all exercise extreme caution when doing
so. Here is an example. When Hong Kong issued lunar gold coins years
ago, wild speculations followed because of the limited mintage, and the
price skyrocketed. The British Authority in Hong Kong immediately
decided to restrike the balance in the planned mintage, which
contributed to the stabilization of the price.
Now let's take a
look at the explanations from the currency issuing authorities on the
restrikes of precious metal coins. The following quotations are from an
administrator of the Gold and Silver Currency Division of the People
Bank of China:
A. For precious metal coins issued in the
years of China Mint Company (i.e. before 1987), China Gold Coin Co.
cannot apply for restrikes even if the planned mintage was not
fulfilled, because these were different projects managed by two
organizations, unless the precious metal coins had a theme that carried
over from China Mint Company to China Gold Coin Co. (such as Historical
Figures gold and silver coins). That is to say, independent themes
before 1987, such as the 1983 Marco Polo gold and silver coins, the 1986
Year of Peace gold and silver coins will be excluded from restrike
applications from China Gold Coin Co.
B. For precious metal
coins issued by the People's Bank of China and distributed by China Gold
Coin Co., sufficient reasons must be provided for restrikes, to be
approved by the Gold and Silver Currency Division of the People's Bank
of China. Moreover, if the quantity of the requested restrikes is too
small (below 5,000 pieces in one application), the proposal for
restrikes will most likely be rejected. (Comment: this information will
make collectors happy who follow the natural law of collection, because
many types with a small mintage will not be restruck. The original
actual mintage becomes an excellent reference).
C. Starting
last year, all the newly approved precious metal coins will not be
announced by the People's Bank of China if less than 70% of the planned
mintage is met, and certainly will not be approved for production. If
the newly approved precious metal coins reach 70% of the planned
mintage, the balance can be restruck, but the approved restrike window
is one year. (Comment: this information will make collectors feel
certain about the release mintage of new coins.)
We cannot talk
about restrikes without mentioning the other important term: melting.
Melting is exactly the opposite to restriking. What are the historical
records of melting in official books? 2007 was the 20th anniversary of
the founding of China Gold Coin Co. In the book "History of China Gold
Coin Co." written by the editorial committee of the book, cases of past
handling of precious metal coin and medal inventories by the China Gold
Coin Co. are clearly laid out:
The first time occurred on October
20, 1995. China Gold Coin Co. called an official meeting to focus on
the inventories of gold and silver commemorative coins. The meeting
decided that: the production facilities would check large size panda
silver coins (including 5 oz and 12 oz ones) minted before 1993. Twenty
specimens would be preserved. Any surplus over that would be melted.
The
second time was the 2002 official reply from the Gold and Silver
Currency Division of the People's Bank of China on the melting of some
of the commemorative gold and silver coin and medal inventories.
(Document No. 20 in 2002 by the Division). This official reply required
China Gold Coin Co. to melt some of the gold and silver coin
inventories, all the gold and silver medals and all the patterns of
unreleased gold and silver coins. Shanghai Mint and Shenyang Mint were
asked to monitor the melting of the gold and silver coin and medal
inventories. Between these two mints, Shenyang Mint was responsible for
monitoring the melting of: 111,593 gold coins and medals, 251,564 silver
coins and medals, and 3,909 bi-metal coins, which contained 794
kilograms of gold and 7,358 kilograms of silver. Shanghai Mint was
responsible for monitoring the melting of: 108,814 gold coins and
medals, 188,275 silver coins and medals, and 16 bi-metal coins, which
contained 916 kilograms of gold and 6,228 kilograms of silver. (Comment:
this happened exactly as China Gold Coin Co. was implementing a policy
of quality products with strict control of quantity. The scope of this
move was totally unexpected. We may say that with this large scale
melting, China Gold Coin Co. depleted most of its inventories.)
Now let's go back to the restrikes in Tables 1 to 3:
A. In
2003, the kilo gold Tang Dynasty Vault Protector was restruck. The kilo
silver Tang Dynasty Vault Protector was restruck in 2003 and 2004. The
Tang Dynasty Vault Protector coins were distributed by Hong Kong Peking
Coin Company Limited (later on renamed as Hong Kong China Coin Company
Limited). When the coins were first marketed in 1998, the coin market
was very slow. The distributor later on requested restrikes to make up
for their loss. Peking Coin Company Limited was a long-time business
partner of China Gold Coin Co. The 8 gram lunars distributed by them
were a huge success. Afterwards, the company made their name with lunar
coins. The restrikes of the Tang Dynasty Vault Protector coins were a
special case of a market compensation contract. If restrikes could be
used to make profits, Peking Coin Company Limited would have taken
advantage of their strong public relation skills and asked Shenyang Mint
to mint 8 gram gold Rat at full speed.
B. The 1999 Water
Spraying Guanyin coins are gold gilt silver coins. According to informed
sources at Shanghai Mint, the condition of the coins in the warehouse
was horrible because of bad storage environment. When China Gold Coin
Co. came to pick up the order, the condition of the coins was considered
below the standards of fiat currency. Shanghai Mint melted all the
inventory, and then re-minted the same number of coins as melted.
C. We
may notice that the Historical Figures silver coins were continuously
restruck. This is why we find brand new complete sets of Historical
Figures silver coins at Lugong and Madian markets. There was a big story
behind this set, as those were no ordinary restrike orders. The
original distributor of this set was MDM in Germany. In the catalog of
precious metal coins and medals by Mr. Ge Zukang, the actual mintage was
very different from the planned mintage. But later on, MDM got in
contact with a Hong Kong businessman by way of a coin dealer at the
Lugong Market, and obtained the approval for restrikes through China
Gold Coin Co. after many twists and turns. The quantity of the restrikes
was very surprising. This restrike plan stirred up a lot of noise (the
People's Bank of China was not aware of these restrikes at first). For
this reason, managers at China Gold Coin Co. responsible for the project
were moved to other positions in order to cool down complaints. This
set of coins will have more restrikes as it was an international project
with the contract already in place.
D. The Silk Road silver
coins were restruck in 2004 and 2005. The distributor of this set was
ING in Belgium. It was another international project, similar to the
Historical Figures silver coins. As the contract was already in place,
there was no option but to restrike the coins.
E. Two
specimens of the 1987 12 oz gold Panda, the 1991 12 oz gold Panda and
the 1996 20 oz Unicorn were restruck in 2004. These were normal
restrikes, as they were needed for China Gold Coin Co. to showcase the
coins.
With all this knowledge, we now have a better
understanding of the actual mintage and restrikes, instead of seeing
restrikes as fearful threats. We now know that theoretically, all the
precious metal coins are likely to be restruck in the future if the
actual mintage falls short of the planned mintage. But in fact the
possibility of restrikes will diminish, to the degree of being
negligible, because the Banking Law of the People's Republic of China
and the Regulations on Renminbi of People's Republic of China will be
further refined. As fiat currency, the approval, production and sales of
precious metal coins will be further regulated. Restrikes will have a
political impact. As collector and researchers, we need to understand
the reason for restrikes of some individual coins. Also, after learning
about restrikes of these coins, we should know that occasional restrikes
of such coins cannot be viewed as the harbinger for restriking all the
precious metal coins, just as we do not rush to get rid of all our color
coin collections when we occasionally find a lot of color paint peeling
off on one color coin.
Finally, precious metal coins from the
PRC usually have a smaller actual mintage than the planned mintage. With
early coins, the actual mintage was far lower than the planned mintage,
such as the 1/2 oz gold Ancient Maritime Ships and the 1 oz gold Sun
Yat-Sen. We often see the actual mintage exceeded the planned mintage by
a few or a few dozen specimens. Don't panic. The extra specimens were
patterns. For example, the 5 oz gold Huangdi Mausoleum had a planned
mintage of 99, but the actual mintage was 100. The extra specimen was a
pattern. Another example is the 5 oz Longmen, which had a planned
mintage of 288. But the actual mintage was 292. Again the extra 4
specimens were patterns. Among the precious metal coins from the PRC,
there were a couple of cases where the actual mintage was more than the
planned mintage by 10%, but this is very rare.
Conclusions:
Actual
mintage is an important parameter in the collection of precious metal
coins from the PRC. It reflects their history at the same time. The
dynamic change of the actual mintage of a certain type is closely
related to restrikes. For new collectors, they can start on their
journey of value collection and value investment by getting to know the
planned mintage of the precious metal coins. Here is an example. In
1989, China issued a palladium panda coin. This was the only palladium
panda coin in the whole world in the 20th century. The planned mintage
was 3,000. However, because of the political events of that year, the
actually mintage was only 1,367. When the price of palladium shot up a
few years ago, the distributor, Mr. Lim Beng Haw, melted a lot from his
inventory, leaving the coin all the more rare. Even if the new collector
does not know about the actual mintage and melting, he or she can
determine that the coin is well worth collecting based merely on the
planned mintage and the fact that it was the only palladium panda coin
in the 20th century. For each and every coin issued by PRC before the
21st century, the information on their approval, production and
distribution is far from complete, which demands great efforts for us to
research them carefully and continuously. We all have to pitch in and
collect valid information from all channels, before finally establishing
a systematic and complete academic theory on precious metal coins from
the PRC.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Feng Yunming and Early Semi-Official Medals
Before China Mint, some commemorative
medals were made by the Beijing Radio Instrument Factory and distributed by
the China National Arts&Crafts Co. and Guangzhou Zhenyi Co., Ltd. (mainly to Hong Kong). There are
different names for these early medals:"prehistoric"
medals, early privately minted medals and early semi-official medals. Following
Huang Ruiyong, I will use "early semi-official medals" because these
medals were minted for official occasions. This post is intended to help
collectors identify them when they turn up on the market. Data in
this post are taken from Feng Jingjing's post (http://www.bqcoin.com/read-htm-tid-1301.html)
and Yu Fuhui's post (http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4e39865b01009n89.html). I
am just summarizing their findings.
When China was opening up right after the
Cultural Revolution, the need came up to issue commemorative medals for some
important events, such as the first Exhibition of Archaeological Finds of the
People's Republic of China in Hong Kong in 1979 and the Exhibition of Chinese
Painting in Hong Kong in the same year. Feng Yunming, who graduated from the
Central Academy of Fine Arts and had been a jewelry designer, lecturer and
business manager, was entrusted with designing these early medals. He lived up to the trust. The medals he designed
proved to be very popular and often sold out quickly as reported by the media. For their success, Mr.
Feng is regarded as the pioneer in medal designing in the PRC. Later on, when
China Mint started to mint commemorative coins and medals, these
semi-official medals were gradually phased out.
The collectability of such early
semi-official medals is still an open question. Top MCC collectors and dealers
value them as an important (though short) episode in the history of modern Chinese numismatics. Many of Feng's medals have made it to the medal star list by Huang Ruiyong, as listed below. Yet average
collectors simply ignore them because of their "semi-official" status
(not from the state-run mints) and their less than perfect design and striking
quality, as compared with the later China Mint releases. Another interesting fact is that despite their not-so-small mintage, they
are hardly available on the market. Their investment potential is unknown at the moment as
there is little sales data available.
Mr. Feng Yunming
Gold medal for the Exhibition of
Archaeological Finds in Hong Kong
(based on the Horse Treading on a Flying Swallow bronze statue, a national treasure. See discussions here: https://www.coincompendium.com/w/index.php/CCT2514)
Mintage: 780
Ranking: 4 stars
Silver medal set for the Exhibition of
Archaeological Finds in Hong Kong
Mintage:3,000
Ranking: 3 stars
Lu Xun medal set with amazing boxes
Mintage:5,000
Ranking: gold – 4 stars; silver – 3 stars
Silver medal set for the Chinese Painting
Exhibition in Hong Kong
Mintage: 3,000
Ranking: 2 stars
Purchase coupon:
Silver medal set for flight between Hong
Kong and Shanghai/Hangzhou
Mintage:5000
Ranking: 3 stars
Gold medal for flight between Hong Kong and
Beijing
Mintage: ?
Ranking: 3 stars
Gold medal for the 70th Anniversary
of the Xinhai Revolution
Mintage: 6,000
Ranking: 3 stars
(Picture unavailable)
Silver medal for the 70th Anniversary
of the Xinhai Revolution
Mintage: 15,000
Ranking: 3 stars
Silver medal for restoration of
Sino-American diplomatic relations
Mintage: 2500
Ranking: 3.5 stars
Mr. Feng's recent work, commemorating the Chinese painting master Qi Baishi:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)